Top

Brief

Macroeconomic Effects of the White House Build Back Better Budget Reconciliation Framework

Macroeconomic Effects of the White House Build Back Better Budget Reconciliation Framework

PWBM estimates that the White House’s Build Back Better reconciliation framework would increase spending by $1.87 trillion over the 10-year budget window and revenues by $1.56 trillion over the same period. By 2050, the proposal would increase federal debt by 2.0 percent and decrease GDP by 0.1 percent, relative to the current law baseline.

Expanding the Child Tax Credit: Budgetary, Distributional, and Incentive Effects

Expanding the Child Tax Credit: Budgetary, Distributional, and Incentive Effects

PWBM projects the House Ways and Means Committee proposal to temporarily extend the 2021 Child Tax Credit design would provide an average 2022 refundable tax cut of $2,785 to 78 percent of households with children at a budgetary cost of $545 billion over the 10-year budget window. Changes to phase-out and phase-in thresholds would reduce the budgetary cost but also reduce the size of the tax cuts.

Can Higher Inflation Help Offset the Effects of Larger Government Debt?

Can Higher Inflation Help Offset the Effects of Larger Government Debt?

Higher inflation reduces the real value of the government’s outstanding debt while increasing the tax burden on capital investment due to lack of inflation indexing. Increasing the current annual inflation target regime from 2 percent to 3 percent inflation reduces debt while lowering GDP.

Revenue and Profit Shifting for the U.S. in a Global Minimum Tax Agreement

Revenue and Profit Shifting for the U.S. in a Global Minimum Tax Agreement

PWBM estimates that tax policy changes in low-tax countries in response to the recent OECD global minimum tax deal could cost the U.S. as much as 50 percent of its minimum tax revenue.

Sens. Manchin and Schumer’s 2021 Senate Budget Reconciliation Agreement: Macroeconomic and Distributional Effects

Sens. Manchin and Schumer’s 2021 Senate Budget Reconciliation Agreement: Macroeconomic and Distributional Effects

PWBM projects that the long-run aggregate macroeconomic effects of Senator Joe Manchin's $1.5T reconciliation framework would be negligible. The economic benefits would largely accrue to younger, poorer households while the economic costs would fall mostly on richer households.

Incentives to Shift U.S. Multinational Profits to Foreign Countries under Tax Changes Proposed by House Ways and Means Committee

Incentives to Shift U.S. Multinational Profits to Foreign Countries under Tax Changes Proposed by House Ways and Means Committee

We project that recent tax reforms proposed by the House Ways and Means Committee would increase the incentive of U.S. firms to shift intangible investments and profits to foreign countries with a tax rate below 20.7 percent.

Effective Tax Rates on U.S. Multinationals’ Foreign Income under Proposed Changes by House Ways and Means and the OECD

Effective Tax Rates on U.S. Multinationals’ Foreign Income under Proposed Changes by House Ways and Means and the OECD

The House Ways and Means Committee reforms proposed as part of budget reconciliation would more than triple the U.S. tax rate on multinationals’ foreign income and produce a higher rate than a proposed global agreement currently being negotiated through the OECD.

Revenue Provisions in the House Ways and Means Reconciliation Bill: Budgetary Effects

Revenue Provisions in the House Ways and Means Reconciliation Bill: Budgetary Effects

PWBM projects that the revenue-raising provisions in the House Ways and Means Reconciliation Bill would raise roughly $2.4 trillion from 2022 to 2031.

The Macroeconomic Effects of the August 2021 Senate Budget Reconciliation Package

The Macroeconomic Effects of the August 2021 Senate Budget Reconciliation Package
  • Drafting a budget from the August 2021 Senate reconciliation framework that satisfies the Senate rules of reconciliation (“Byrd Rule”) will require a decrease in new outlays or a large increase in revenues (or both) after the standard 10-year budget window.

  • One such potential reduction in spending would allow the new non-healthcare related discretionary spending provisions to expire after 2031.

  • With this reduced spending in 2031, we project that the reconciliation package will decrease GDP by 4.0 percent in 2050. Without this spending decrease (and where the Byrd Rule is not satisfied), we project a 4.8 percent fall in GDP in 2050.

Economic Effects from Preschool and Childcare Programs

Economic Effects from Preschool and Childcare Programs

By 2051, we find that a combination of targeted preschool and targeted childcare programs increase GDP by 0.1 percent relative to current policy, even if deficit financed. Universal versions of these programs are more costly and would instead reduce GDP by 0.2 percent by 2051.

Budgetary Offsets for Democrats’ Reconciliation Package: Options

Budgetary Offsets for Democrats’ Reconciliation Package: Options

We analyze a combination of net revenue raisers consistent with the requirements released by the Senate Budget Committee on August 9th, 2021, for budget reconciliation.

Updated Bipartisan Senate Infrastructure Deal: Budgetary and Economic Effects

Updated Bipartisan Senate Infrastructure Deal: Budgetary and Economic Effects

The bipartisan Senate infrastructure deal, endorsed by President Biden, authorizes about $548 billion in additional infrastructure investments, which we estimate is funded by $132 billion in new tax provisions and $351 billion in new deficits. We project that proposal would have no significant effect on GDP by end of the budget window (2031) or in the long run (2050).

Profit Shifting and the Global Minimum Tax

Profit Shifting and the Global Minimum Tax

We estimate that the recent OECD proposal for a global minimum tax would triple the effective U.S. tax rate on foreign income from 2 percentage points to 5.8 percentage points. The Biden administration’s proposed changes to the U.S. global minimum tax regime would instead raise the effective U.S. tax rate on foreign income to 12.4 percentage points.

President Biden’s FY2022 Budget Proposal: Budgetary and Economic Effects

President Biden’s FY2022 Budget Proposal: Budgetary and Economic Effects

PWBM estimates that President Biden’s FY2022 budget proposal would increase spending by $6.1 trillion and increase revenue by $3.9 trillion over the 2022-2031 budget window. By 2050, we project that the President’s budget proposals would decrease public debt by 5.1 percent and decrease GDP by 1.5 percent relative to current law.

Effects of President Biden’s Unauthorized Immigrant Legalization Proposal on SNAP and Payroll Tax

Effects of President Biden’s Unauthorized Immigrant Legalization Proposal on SNAP and Payroll Tax

PWBM projects that the legalization provisions of the U.S. Citizenship Act proposed by President Biden would increase per capita spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by 1.2 percent in 2030 and 0.8 percent 2050 relative to the current policy baseline. Per capita payroll taxes would decrease by 0.1 percent relative to the current policy baseline.

Bipartisan Senate Infrastructure Deal: Budgetary and Economic Effects

Bipartisan Senate Infrastructure Deal: Budgetary and Economic Effects

The bipartisan Senate infrastructure deal, endorsed by President Biden, authorizes $1.2 trillion of spending, representing about $579 billion in additional infrastructure investments funded by a mix of deficits, user fees, and other tax provisions. This proposal would increase output in 2050 by 0.1 percent.

Republican and Bipartisan Infrastructure Proposals: Budget and Economic Effects

Republican and Bipartisan Infrastructure Proposals: Budget and Economic Effects

We estimate that Sen. Capito’s $330 billion infrastructure package, funded by user fees over 8 years, would increase GDP by about 0.05 percent in 2050. A $579 billion infrastructure investment being considered by a bipartisan group of senators, would increase output in 2050 by 0.1 percent if funded by user fees or have roughly zero net effect on GDP if deficit financed.

President Biden's American Families Plan: Budgetary and Macroeconomic effects

President Biden's American Families Plan: Budgetary and Macroeconomic effects

PWBM projects that the American Families Plan (AFP) would spend $2.5 trillion, about $700 billion more than the White House’s estimate, over the 10-year budget window, 2022-2031. We estimate that AFP would raise 1.3 trillion in new tax revenue over the same period. By 2050, the AFP would increase government debt by almost 5 percent and decrease GDP by 0.4 percent.

Corporate Debt: Historical Perspective and Options for Reducing Interest Deductibility

Corporate Debt: Historical Perspective and Options for Reducing Interest Deductibility

While corporations are at historically high levels of debt relative to assets, leverage remains close to its historical average relative to firms’ market value and relative to interest expense as a fraction of cashflow. In PWBM’s dynamic firm model, reducing the deductibility of interest expenses by 10 percentage points decreases corporate output by 0.26 percent while decreasing corporate debt by 6.76 percent.

President Biden’s $2.7 Trillion American Jobs Plan: Budgetary and Macroeconomic Effects

President Biden’s $2.7 Trillion American Jobs Plan: Budgetary and Macroeconomic Effects

PWBM projects that the American Jobs Plan proposed by President Biden would spend $2.7 trillion and raise $2.1 trillion dollars over the 10-year budget window 2022-2031. The proposal’s business tax provisions continue past the budget window, decreasing government debt by 6.4 percent and decreasing GDP by 0.8 percent in 2050, relative to current law.