Key Points
On Thursday November 9th, 2017 the Senate Committee on Finance majority released its version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that changes both individual and business taxes.
Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWBM) finds that the bill lowers tax revenues by $1.4 to $1.7 trillion over 10 years, including accounting for growth effects. Debt rises by $1.9 to $2.0 trillion over the same period. Looking beyond the 10-year budget window, by 2040, revenue falls between $4.3 trillion and $5.2 trillion while debt increases by $7.0 to $7.6 trillion.
PWBM projects that GDP will be between 0.3% to 0.8% larger in 2027 relative to its value in that year with no policy change, and between -0.2% and 0.5% larger in 2040. Over the long-run, additional debt reduces the positive impact on GDP.
The Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (11/9/17): Static and Dynamic Effects on the Budget and the Economy
Introduction
On November 9nd, 2017 the Senate Committee on Finance majority released the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that would fundamentally change the U.S. tax system. This brief uses the Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWBM) to report the projected impact on the federal budget and the economy. Readers are encouraged to read our previous analyses of the House version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for related definitions used in this brief. (An update to our analysis of the House version of the bill, which includes their amendments, can be found here.)
The Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Main Features
The Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) reduces taxes on both individuals and businesses in addition to implementing international reforms. Tables 1 and 2 show the reforms that are included in the Senate TCJA and compares them to current policy1 and the House TCJA which we described here.
For individuals, Table 1 shows that the Senate TCJA retains seven brackets, but reduces the top rate to 38.5 percent. Both the Senate and House bills roughly double the standard deduction, repeals personal exemptions, switches to chained CPI, and eliminates the alternative minimum tax (AMT), and enhances the Child Tax Credit (CTC). One difference is that the Senate bill repeals the deduction for state and local income and property taxes and retains the deduction for mortgage interest while the House version repeals the deduction for state and local income taxes (and caps property deductions at $10,000) and limits the deduction for mortgage interest. Finally, the Senate retains the estate tax (with an expanded exemption) while the House repeals it.
Table 1: Reforms to Individual Tax Provisions in the Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tax Provision | House | Senate | Current Policy (2017) | |
Individual Taxes | ||||
Individual rate | 12%, 25%, 35%, 39.6% | 10%, 12%, 22.5%, 25%, 32.5%, 35%, 38.5% | 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35%, 39.6% | |
Individual tax rate bracket thresholds | 12% bracket: up to $45,000 (single), up to $90,000 (married) |
10% bracket: up to $9,525 (single), up to $19,050 (married) |
10% bracket: up to $9,325 (single), up to $18,650 (married) |
|
25% bracket: $45,000 to $200,000 (single), $90,000 to $260,000 (married) |
12% bracket: $9,525 to $38,700 (single), $19,050 to $77,400 (married) |
15% bracket: $9,325 to $37,950 (single), $18,650 to $75,900 (married) |
||
35% bracket: $200,000 to $500,000 (single), $260,000 to $1,000,000 (married) |
22.5% bracket: $38,700 to $60,000 (single), $77,400 to $120,000 (married) |
25% bracket: $37,950 to $91,900 (single), $75,900 to $153,100 (married) |
||
39.6% bracket: more than $500,000 (single), more than $1,000,000 (married) |
25% bracket: $60,000 to $170,000 (single), $120,000 to $290,000 (married) |
28% bracket: $91,900 to $191,650 (single), $153,100 to $233,350 (married) |
||
12% bracket phased out for high income taxpayers | 32.5% bracket: $170,000 to $200,000 (single), $290,000 to $390,000 (married) |
33% bracket: $191,650 to $416,700 (single), $233,350 to $416,700 (married) |
||
35% bracket: $200,000 to $500,000 (single), $390,000 to $1,000,000 (married) |
35% bracket: $416,700 to $418,400 (single), $416,700 to $470,700 (married) |
|||
38.5% bracket: more than $500,000 (single), more than $1,000,000 (married) |
39.6% bracket: more than $418,400 (single), more than $470,700 (married) |
|||
Unearned income of children | Current Policy | Child's tax rates & trusts and estates | Parent's tax rates | |
Standard deduction | Standard deduction of $12,000 single, $24,000 married. | Standard deduction of $12,000 single, $24,000 married. | Standard deduction of $6,350 single, $12,700 married. | |
Deduction for elderly & blind | Repealed | Current policy | Yes | |
Personal exemptions | Repealed | Repealed | $4,050 each for taxpayer, spouse & dependents | |
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) | Repealed | Repealed | Yes | |
Index | Chained CPI | Chained CPI | CPI | |
Itemized Deductions | Limits repealed | Limits repealed | Subject to limits | |
Tax preparation expenses, taxes not paid or accrued in a trade or business | Repealed | Repealed | Yes | |
Expenses attributable to being an employee | Repealed | Current Policy | Yes | |
Contributions to medical savings accounts | Repealed | Current Policy | Yes | |
Educator expenses | Repealed | Current Policy | Yes | |
Interest on home equity debt | Current Policy | Repealed | Yes | |
Certain miscellaneous expenses | Current Policy | Repealed | Yes | |
Personal casualty losses | Repealed, other than for those affected by certain hurricanes | Repealed, other than for disasters | Yes | |
Medical expenses | Repealed | Current Policy | Yes | |
State and local income and sales taxes | Repealed | Repealed | Yes | |
State and local property taxes | Up to $10,000 | Repealed | Yes | |
Home mortgage-interest | Up to $500,000 on new loans | Current policy | Up to $1M | |
Charitable contributions | Certain contributions are limited and repealed | Increase percentage limit for cash to public charities | Yes | |
Wagering losses | Limited to wagering winnings | Modified | Yes | |
Alimony Payments | Not deductible by payer nor income for payee | Current policy | Yes | |
Child Tax Credit (CTC) | $1,600 per qualified child | $1,650 per qualified child, qualified child age limit increased to 18 | $1,000 per qualified child | |
$1,000 refundable portion would be indexed and not rise above $1,600 | $1,000 refundable portion would be indexed to nearest $100, refundable up to 15% of income over $2,500 | Refundable up to 15% of income over $3,000 | ||
$300 credit for non-child dependents, including the taxpayer, non-refundable, expires after 2022 | $500 credit for non-child dependents | No | ||
Phase out income thresholds $115,000 (single) and $230,000 (married) | Phase out income thresholds $500,000 (single) and $1,000,000 (married) | Phase out income thresholds $75,000 (single) and $110,000 (married) | ||
Credit for adoption | Current policy | Current policy | Yes | |
Credit for elderly or disabled | Repealed | Current policy | Yes | |
Credit for electric motor vehicles, interest on certain home mortgages | Repealed | Current policy | Yes | |
CTC, Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC) | Work-eligible SSN required to claim refundable portion, SSN for child to claim enhanced CTC, other modifications to EITC | SSN required for each child to claim refundable portion of CTC | Yes | |
Education | ||||
AOTC, Hope Scholarship Credit (HSC), Lifetime Learning Credit (LLC) | Credit for first $2,000 of certain higher education expenses, 25% of next $2,000, fifth year at 1/2 of the first 4, with $500 refundable | Current policy | Yes | |
Coverdell Accounts | No new contributions to Coverdell accounts | Current policy | Contributions of $2000 per beneficiary | |
529 Plans | Elementary and high school expenses up to $10,000 and apprenticeship programs will be qualified expenses, a child in utero may be a beneficiary | Current policy | Yes | |
Deduction for student loan interest, tuition and expenses | Repealed | Current policy | Yes | |
Exclusion for savings bonds for education expenses, qualified tuition programs, employer-provided education programs, student loan forgiveness | Repealed, changes made to student loan forgiveness | Current policy | Yes | |
Exclusions | ||||
Gain from sale of a principal residence | Must be principal residence for 5 out of the previous 8 years, only used once every 5 years, phased out for high income | Must be principal residence for 5 out of the previous 8 years, only used once every 5 years | Must be principal residence for 2 out of the previous 5 years | |
Employee achievement awards, dependent care assistance programs, adoption assistance programs, employer provided housing | Repealed, employer provided housing limited & phased out for high income, dependent care continues through 2022 | Current policy | Yes | |
Employer-provided bicycle commuter fringe benefit | Current policy | Repealed | Yes | |
Employer-provided qualified moving expense reimbursement | Repealed, retained for Armed Forces | Repealed, retained for Armed Forces | Yes | |
Pension Savings and Retirement | Modifications, including to the minimum age for in-service contributions, hardship withdrawals and distributions, and the recharacterization of ROTH IRA contributions as traditional IRA contributions | Current Policy | Yes |
For businesses, Table 2 shows that the Senate TCJA reduces the corporate tax rate to 20 percent, but not until 2019. Like the House, the Senate bill also allows full expensing for five years and limits the net interest deduction. The Senate includes a deduction for pass-through businesses, while the House introduces a special rate of 25% for pass-throughs.
Table 2: Reforms to Business, International, and Other Tax Provisions in the Senate Tax Cuts the Jobs Act
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tax Provision | House | Senate | Current Policy (2017) | |
Business Taxes | ||||
Corporate rate | 20%, 25% for personal services corporations | 20%, starting in 2019 | 15%, 25%, 34%, 39%, 34%, 35%, 38%, 35% | |
Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) | Repealed, carryforward changed | Repealed, carryforward changed | 20% on income above $40,000 | |
Deduction of investment expenses in the same year "full expensing" | Allowed for 5 years & 179 expensing expanded for certain businesses | Allowed for 5 years & 179 expensing expanded | Depreciation over time, some limits | |
Net interest deduction | Capped at 30% of income, modifications including small business exemption | Capped at 30% of income, carry forward of denied deduction | Yes, subject to limitations | |
Certain business tax expenditures, including amortization of research and experimentation expenditures, contingent fee cases, qualified equity grants and those related to energy, insurance, net operating losses, bonds, compensation, small business accounting and exempt organizations | Repealed and modified | Repealed and modified | Yes | |
Other Taxes | ||||
Pass-through rate | Top rate of 25%, for certain income, bottom rate of 9% phased in for certain income | Individual income tax rates | Individual income tax rates | |
Prevent conversion of wage income to business income by wealthy individuals as a result of new pass-through rate and pass-through conversion to C corporations | Active owners pay individual rates on 70% of income from pass-through business or according to their "capital percentage", 25% rate does not apply to professional services pass-through businesses such as lawyers and financial services, and treatment of S corporation conversion to C corporations modified. | No | No | |
Determination of active ownership | Based on number of hours spent participating in activities of the business | No | No | |
Deduction | No | 17.4% deduction for certain non-service income, exception for service income below $75,000 (single) and $150,000 (married), exception is phased out over next $25,000 (single) and $50,000 (married) | No | |
Active pass-through losses | Current policy | Repeal above $250,000 (single), $500,000 (married) | Yes | |
Partnerships | 3-year holding period for long term capital gain for certain partnership interests | Modified, including to tax on sale, definition of built in loss for loss transfers, allowance of partner's share of loss, worker classification safe harbor and withholding, reporting thresholds, and information reporting requirements | Yes | |
Income subject to Self-Employment Contributions Act (SECA) treatment | Current policy | Current policy | Earnings from a trade or business carried on as a sole proprietor, independent contractor or partner | |
Estate tax and generation skipping transfer tax | Exclusion doubled and indexed or inflation, repealed after 2023, step-up in basis is unchanged | Exclusion doubled | Top tax rate is 40% with estates over $5.49 million (single), $10.98 million (married) subject to tax. | |
Gift tax top rate of 35%, exclusion is unchanged and indexed for inflation | Exclusion doubled | Yes | ||
International Taxes | ||||
One-time repatriation rate | 14% on cash, 7% non-cash, paid over 8 years | 10% on cash, 5% non-cash | No | |
Territorial tax system | Yes | Yes | Global tax system | |
Excise tax on outbound related-party payments; ECI election | Choice to treat as connected income, for certain payments | No | No | |
Other international reforms | Repealed and Modified | Modified | Yes |
For businesses that operate internationally, the Senate introduces a territorial tax system. The bill also allows for a special one-time repatriation rate for the previous profits of foreign subsidiaries.
The Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would make many changes to both individual and business tax provisions. More information on the Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act can be found at the Senate Finance Committee and in analysis by the Joint Committee on Tax.
Static Revenue Effects of the Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Table 3 shows PWBM’s estimate revenue effects of TCJA over the 10 year budget window and over the long-run. Table 3 also compares PWBM’s estimated revenue losses against those estimated by JCT, which is staffed by leading government tax economists. PWBM estimates a static revenue loss from 2018 - 2027 equal to $1,751 billion, or about $255 billion more than that estimated by JCT. The difference in revenue losses are due to several factors: moderately different macroeconomic forecasts and parameters; PWBM’s forecast of demographic changes compared to JCT’s focus on tax filers; and, interactions when changing multiple parts of the tax code at the same time. From 2018 - 2040, PWBM estimates federal revenues will be $5,052 billion lower under the bill than otherwise.
Table 3: Estimates of the Effect of the Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on Federal Tax Revenues
Revenue Effect 2018-2027 | Revenue Effect 2018-2040 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tax Provision | JCT | PWBM | PWBM | |
Individual | ||||
New tax rate and bracket structure | -1,326 | -1,576 | -4,697 | |
Expand the standard deduction and repeal personal exemptions | 651 | 596 | 1,714 | |
Index tax provisions to chained CPI | 131 | 87 | 751 | |
New pass-through business deduction | -460 | -494 | -1,438 | |
Pass-through business loss limits | 176 | 201 | 640 | |
Expand Child Tax Credit (CTC) and new non-child dependent credit | -582 | -580 | -1,607 | |
Repeal and modifications to itemized deductions | 1,266 | 1,022 | 3,082 | |
Repeal Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) 2 | -707 | -347 | -1,059 | |
Reforms to certain deductions and credits 3 | 34 | 25 | 61 | |
Reforms to certain exclusions 4 5 | 7 | 7 | 22 | |
Estate Tax Exemption Doubled 6 | -94 | -94 | -303 | |
Subtotal | -903 | -1,152 | -2,833 | |
Corporate | ||||
New corporate tax rates and repeal of corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) | -1,370 | -1,340 | -3,959 | |
Net Interest Deduction capped at 30% of income | 308 | 296 | 809 | |
Deduction of investment expenses in the same year "full expensing" allowed for 5 years | -61 | -47 | -27 | |
Modification to net operating loss deductions | 170 | 111 | 288 | |
Repeal of Domestic Production Deduction | 81 | 101 | 285 | |
Reforms to certain business tax expenditures 7 | 174 | 170 | 613 | |
Subtotal | -697 | -709 | -1,990 | |
International 8 | ||||
Territorial System | -216 | -154 | -436 | |
Special one-time repatriation rate | 190 | 143 | 146 | |
Other international reforms 9 | 130 | 121 | 61 | |
Subtotal | 104 | 110 | -229 | |
TOTAL | -1,496 | -1,751 | -5,052 |
Note: Estimates are net of effects on federal spending.
The above estimates are net of effects on federal tax refunds, which are recorded as outlays, as is consistent with JCT’s methodology. PWBM finds that the 10-year revenue loss that does not incorporate effects on outlays is $1.8 trillion.
Dynamic Budget Effects of the Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Table 4 shows that over the 10-year budget window, The Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is projected to reduce federal tax revenues between $1.4 trillion (high initial return to capital) to $1.7 trillion (low initial return to capital). Debt rises by more, by about $1.9 trillion to $2.0 trillion, over this period, due to debt services. By 2040, revenue falls between $4.3 trillion and $5.2 trillion, whereas debt increases by $7.0 trillion to $7.6 trillion.
Table 4: TCJA Effects on Revenue and Debt Relative to Current Policy
Revenue (billions of $) | Debt (billions of $) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Static | Dynamic | Static | Dynamic | |||
Years | High return to capital | Low return to capital | High return to capital | Low return to capital | ||
2018-2027 | -$1,781 | -$1,422 | -$1,677 | $2,046 | $1,875 | $2,019 |
2018-2040 | -$5,288 | -$4,272 | -$5,173 | $7,681 | $7,004 | $7,627 |
Note: The above estimates focus on the official definition of “revenue” and, therefore, do not incorporate tax refunds, which are recorded as outlays. Debt rises faster than lost revenue due to debt service costs, which revenue estimates ignore.
Dynamic Economic Effects of the Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
The Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has effects beyond federal revenues, including effects on GDP, labor income and U.S. capital services, summarized in Table 5. By 2027, GDP is between 0.3 percent and 0.8 percent larger than current policy in that year. However, this initial boost fades over time as more debt accumulates. By 2040, GDP is between 0.2 percent less and 0.5 percent larger than current policy in that year.
Table 5: TCJA Effects on Key Macroeconomic Variables Relative to Current Policy in Year Shown
GDP (% change) | Labor Income (% change) | Capital Services (% change) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | High return to capital | Low return to capital | High return to capital | Low return to capital | High return to capital | Low return to capital |
2027 | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 2.6% | 0.8% |
2040 | 0.5% | -0.2% | 0.5% | -0.3% | 2.1% | -0.3% |
Note: Percentage change relative to current policy in 2027 and 2040, respectively. Consistent with our previous dynamic analysis and the empirical evidence, the projections above assume that the U.S. economy is 40% open and 60% closed. Specifically, 40% of new government debt is purchased by foreigners.
Table 5 shows changes in the level of GDP in the shown years relative to current policy. An alternative measure, as shown in Table 6, is to examine changes in the annual growth rate of GDP that is needed to produce the different levels shown in GDP. PWBM finds that over the next ten years, average annual GDP growth will be 0.03 percentage points to 0.08 percentage points higher under TCJA than with no tax changes. However, from 2028 to 2040, average annual GDP growth will be 0.02 percentage points to 0.04 percentage points smaller than under current law, due to the effects of larger debt.
Table 6: TCJA Effects on Average Annual GDP Growth Relative to Current Policy over Period of Time Shown
Average Annual GDP Growth Rate (percentage point change) | ||
---|---|---|
Dynamic | ||
Years | High return to capital | Low return to capital |
2018-2027 | 0.08 | 0.03 |
2028-2040 | -0.02 | -0.04 |
Note: Percentage point change relative to current policy from 2018-2027 and 2028-2040, respectively. Consistent with our previous dynamic analysis and the empirical evidence, the projections above assume that the U.S. economy is 40% open and 60% closed. Specifically, 40% of new government debt is purchased by foreigners.
Conclusion
The Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would make many changes to both individual and business tax provisions. Penn Wharton Budget Model projects that the changes in the bill reduce federal tax revenue in both the short- and long-run relative to current policy. In the near term, there is a small boost to GDP, but that increase diminishes over time due to debt buildup.
-
PWBM’s integrated model includes both revenue and spending policy. For our tax simulator, we model “current law” that allows tax provisions to expire as scheduled, consistent with JCT’s approach. For our spending side, we model “current policy” that does not, for example, allow changes to mandatory changes when, for example, the Social Security’s trust funds are exhausted. This integration provides a more holistic analysis since some government benefit formulas, including the initial calculation of Social Security benefits upon retirement, are explicitly tied to the growth in average wages throughout a participant's lifetime. ↩
-
PWBM's estimate of the revenue effect of repealing the individual AMT compared to baseline is $515 billion. ↩
-
Reforms to certain credits and deductions includes requiring Social Security numbers for for each child to claim refundable portion of CTC and repeal of the moving expense deduction. ↩
-
Reforms to certain exclusions includes repeal of exclusion for employer-provided bicycle commuter fringe benefit and qualified moving expense reimbursements and modified exclusion of gain from sale of a principal residence. ↩
-
For these items PWBM applies PWBM's macroeconomic forecast to JCT estimates. ↩
-
For these items PWBM applies PWBM's macroeconomic forecast to JCT estimates. ↩
-
For these items PWBM applies PWBM's macroeconomic forecast to JCT estimates. ↩
-
PWBM's estimates include lower cross-border profit flows than JCT's. ↩
-
For these items PWBM applies PWBM's macroeconomic forecast to JCT estimates. ↩