Blog

Short rolling posts in reverse chronological order.

Gas Tax Holidays: Price and Revenue Effects by State

PWBM ·

Projected per-gallon price drops and two-month revenue losses if states suspend gasoline and diesel taxes.

More

Several states are considering suspending state-level gasoline and diesel taxes (excluding the federal tax). Table 1 presents the projected impact on the per-gallon price of gasoline and diesel, as well as the estimated revenue loss to each state from suspending these taxes for two months. Revenue loss estimates are adjusted for leakage due to existing partial exemptions and refunds (e.g., diesel used in farming and food processing, and gasoline used in off-highway agricultural activities).

Table 1: State-by-State Projected Price Drops and Revenue Losses
from a Two-Month Gas Tax Holiday

DOWNLOAD DATA
Table 1: State-by-State Projected Price Drops and Revenue Losses from a Two-Month Gas Tax Holiday
State Gas Price Drop ($/gal) Diesel Price Drop ($/gal) Revenue Loss, 2 Months ($)
Alabamaβˆ’$0.22βˆ’$0.20$210,062,428
Alaskaβˆ’$0.06βˆ’$0.05$8,577,309
Arizonaβˆ’$0.13βˆ’$0.16$127,254,311
Arkansasβˆ’$0.18βˆ’$0.17$95,318,174
Californiaβˆ’$0.51βˆ’$0.52$1,522,425,187
Coloradoβˆ’$0.21βˆ’$0.21$108,055,255
Connecticutβˆ’$0.18βˆ’$0.29$80,440,979
Delawareβˆ’$0.17βˆ’$0.13$21,715,820
District of Columbiaβˆ’$0.26βˆ’$0.21$4,619,160
Floridaβˆ’$0.29βˆ’$0.24$724,647,729
Georgiaβˆ’$0.25βˆ’$0.23$361,958,590
Hawaiiβˆ’$0.13βˆ’$0.11$15,661,593
Idahoβˆ’$0.24βˆ’$0.20$65,082,395
Illinoisβˆ’$0.48βˆ’$0.44$651,423,204
Indianaβˆ’$0.39βˆ’$0.37$391,988,330
Iowaβˆ’$0.22βˆ’$0.20$107,816,097
Kansasβˆ’$0.18βˆ’$0.16$88,506,891
Kentuckyβˆ’$0.19βˆ’$0.14$125,994,963
Louisianaβˆ’$0.15βˆ’$0.13$105,980,039
Maineβˆ’$0.22βˆ’$0.19$45,796,583
Marylandβˆ’$0.33βˆ’$0.28$241,795,466
Massachusettsβˆ’$0.20βˆ’$0.17$133,660,518
Michiganβˆ’$0.49βˆ’$0.30$561,281,455
Minnesotaβˆ’$0.24βˆ’$0.19$189,533,011
Mississippiβˆ’$0.15βˆ’$0.13$70,812,952
Missouriβˆ’$0.22βˆ’$0.18$206,014,044
Montanaβˆ’$0.24βˆ’$0.18$45,243,639
Nebraskaβˆ’$0.24βˆ’$0.19$81,562,856
Nevadaβˆ’$0.17βˆ’$0.17$65,851,140
New Hampshireβˆ’$0.17βˆ’$0.14$31,078,590
New Jerseyβˆ’$0.35βˆ’$0.31$416,999,691
New Mexicoβˆ’$0.14βˆ’$0.14$60,951,201
New Yorkβˆ’$0.17βˆ’$0.14$285,526,677
North Carolinaβˆ’$0.30βˆ’$0.24$401,233,621
North Dakotaβˆ’$0.17βˆ’$0.14$29,476,766
Ohioβˆ’$0.28βˆ’$0.28$483,656,426
Oklahomaβˆ’$0.14βˆ’$0.12$106,672,826
Oregonβˆ’$0.29βˆ’$0.24$161,425,600
Pennsylvaniaβˆ’$0.42βˆ’$0.45$561,462,090
Rhode Islandβˆ’$0.30βˆ’$0.25$30,117,875
South Carolinaβˆ’$0.21βˆ’$0.17$160,473,600
South Dakotaβˆ’$0.22βˆ’$0.18$35,164,500
Tennesseeβˆ’$0.20βˆ’$0.17$211,028,160
Texasβˆ’$0.14βˆ’$0.12$576,828,000
Utahβˆ’$0.28βˆ’$0.24$107,519,264
Vermontβˆ’$0.23βˆ’$0.20$19,874,505
Virginiaβˆ’$0.30βˆ’$0.26$351,410,250
Washingtonβˆ’$0.43βˆ’$0.37$329,081,019
West Virginiaβˆ’$0.26βˆ’$0.21$70,362,406
Wisconsinβˆ’$0.24βˆ’$0.20$180,315,324
Wyomingβˆ’$0.17βˆ’$0.14$25,652,784

Sources and Notes:
Gas Tax Rate ($/gal): Federation of Tax Administrators (FTA) / State Revenue Departments. Rates projected as of January 1, 2026; state portion only.
Diesel Tax Rate ($/gal): Federation of Tax Administrators (FTA) / State Revenue Departments. Rates projected as of January 1, 2026; state portion only.
Actual Reported Annual Revenue ($): Net treasury receipts (Highway Fund) as reported by FHWA Table MF‑1 and state ACFRs.
Gas Consumption (gal): EIA SEDS Table F10 (Motor Gasoline). One barrel = 42 gallons. Data represent 2024 transportation‑sector estimates.
Diesel Consumption (gal): EIA SEDS Table F12 (Distillate Fuel Oil). One barrel = 42 gallons. Data represent 2024 transportation‑sector estimates.
Price Drop Methodology: PWBM Synthetic Control findings. Gasoline pass‑through = 0.72; diesel pass‑through = 0.60 (assumed lower due to commercial supply stickiness). See Effects of a State Gasoline Tax Holiday.


A Lower Cap on the Marginal Tax Benefit of Itemized Deductions

PWBM ·

Revenue and distributional effects of lowering the cap on the marginal tax benefit of itemized deductions to 32% or 24%.

More

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) instituted a cap on the marginal tax benefit of itemized deductions of 35 percent beginning in 2026. We present conventional 10-year revenue forecasts and distributional tables for two options: Lower the cap on the marginal tax benefit of itemized deductions from 35 percent to 32 percent (Option 1) or to 24 percent (Option 2), beginning in 2026.

Table 1 shows that the 32 percent cap would raise $110 billion over ten years. The 24 percent cap would raise $475 billion over ten years.

Table 1: Estimated Revenue Effects,
FY 2026–2035

DOWNLOAD DATA
Table 1: Estimated Revenue Effects, FY 2026–2035
Provision 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Total, 2026–2035
Option 1: Cap Itemized Deductions at 32% 4.8 10.0 10.4 10.9 11.2 11.3 12.0 12.6 13.2 14.0 110.4
Option 2: Cap Itemized Deductions at 24% 21.0 44.6 46.9 49.1 50.2 47.0 49.7 52.6 55.6 58.6 475.3

Note: Change in revenue, billions of dollars.

Table 2 presents conventional distributional analysis. Option 1 mostly impacts those in the top 10 percent of the income distribution while Option 2 impacts those in the top 20 percent.

Table 2: Estimated Distributional Effects,
TY 2027

DOWNLOAD DATA
Table 2: Estimated Distributional Effects, TY 2027
Income Group Lower Cutoff ($) Avg. Change in After-Tax Income ($) Avg. % Change in After-Tax Income
Option 1: Cap Itemized Deductions at 32%
First quintile 0 0 0%
Second quintile 18,000 0 0%
Middle quintile 53,000 0 0%
Fourth quintile 96,000 0 0%
80–90% 179,000 0 0%
90–95% 272,000 βˆ’55 0%
95–99% 401,000 βˆ’470 βˆ’0.1%
99–99.9% 1,020,000 βˆ’2,425 βˆ’0.2%
Top 0.1% 4,451,000 βˆ’22,990 βˆ’0.2%
Option 2: Cap Itemized Deductions at 24%
First quintile 0 0 0%
Second quintile 18,000 0 0%
Middle quintile 53,000 0 0%
Fourth quintile 96,000 0 0%
80–90% 179,000 βˆ’50 0%
90–95% 272,000 βˆ’255 βˆ’0.1%
95–99% 401,000 βˆ’2,680 βˆ’0.6%
99–99.9% 1,020,000 βˆ’9,190 βˆ’0.7%
Top 0.1% 4,451,000 βˆ’90,535 βˆ’0.7%

Note: TY = tax year.